The Future of AI: Beyond Replacing Interface Designers to Replacing Interfaces Themselves
Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been making waves in various industries, from healthcare to finance, and …
Managing permissions is one of the most critical aspects of building scalable, maintainable web applications. Yet, many developers start with overly simplistic methods that quickly become unwieldy. In this post, we’ll explore three robust permission systems — Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), and hybrid multi-tenancy setups — providing clear, actionable advice you can apply today.
Early in development, you might use basic conditional checks like:
if (user.role === 'admin') {
// Allow deletion
}
This seems simple, but problems arise as roles expand. Adding a “moderator” or allowing users to delete their own content leads to sprawling if
statements:
if (user.role === 'admin' || user.role === 'moderator' || user.id === comment.authorId) {
// Allow deletion
}
These checks, scattered across your codebase, make maintenance a nightmare. Updating one permission requires modifying multiple files, increasing the risk of errors.
The solution? Centralized and scalable permission systems.
RBAC simplifies permission logic by associating roles with predefined actions. Instead of coding permissions everywhere, you maintain a single configuration file or database table.
const roles = {
admin: ['delete:comments', 'edit:comments'],
moderator: ['delete:comments'],
user: ['delete:own_comments'],
};
function hasPermission(user, action) {
return roles[user.role]?.includes(action);
}
Limitations:
RBAC struggles with contextual permissions, like allowing a user to delete comments only when they are the author.
ABAC builds on RBAC by factoring in object attributes (e.g., ownership, status). Instead of merely checking a user’s role, ABAC evaluates whether conditions tied to the user, action, and resource are met.
function canDeleteComment(user, comment) {
if (user.role === 'admin') return true;
if (user.role === 'moderator') return true;
if (user.id === comment.authorId && comment.status !== 'published') return true;
return false;
}
Benefits of ABAC:
For multi-tenant applications like Slack or Google Drive, combining RBAC and ABAC ensures scalability and customization. Users may belong to multiple organizations or need distinct permissions for specific resources.
const userRoles = [
{ userId: 1, role: 'admin', organizationId: 101 },
{ userId: 1, role: 'viewer', resourceId: 202 },
];
function getUserRoles(userId, context) {
return userRoles.filter(role => role.userId === userId && matchesContext(role, context));
}
This model supports scenarios where users have varying roles across organizations or resources, e.g., being an “admin” for one team and a “viewer” for another.
Applications with shared resources — like files or folders — require an additional layer of granularity.
User ID | Role | Resource ID | Resource Type |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Owner | 301 | File |
2 | Editor | 301 | File |
3 | Viewer | 302 | Folder |
function canAccessResource(user, resourceId, action) {
const permissions = getUserPermissions(user.id, resourceId);
return permissions.some(permission => permission.actions.includes(action));
}
By consolidating resource-specific roles into a flexible schema, you simplify the logic while retaining the ability to scale.
This post empowers you to build scalable permission systems using RBAC, ABAC, and hybrid models. By choosing the right approach, you’ll ensure your application is future-proof and easy to maintain.
Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been making waves in various industries, from healthcare to finance, and …
Introduction Having a unique password for each online account is essential in today’s digital world. Without …
We've worked with customers of every size: from startup to enterprise, and everything in between.
Here are a few of the exciting projects we've been working on recently.